19 posts tagged “football”
Been a while, I appologize. But lets jump right into the meat of the discussion, the NFL Draft. I'm going to avoid doing mocks, or giving generalizations, but instead I'll try to look at some of the sub top-15 prospects, and give my take on how they played, their strengths and weaknesses, and where they may end up going (and how they may end up doing). I'm going to start with one Felix Jones, runningback, Arkansas. Jones sat behind Darren McFadden on the depth chart for two seasons, but put up impressive numbers. He has had over 1,150 yards two seasons running. However, he has only carried the ball 387 times in his career. Two running backs put up the same number of rushing attempts this season in college football (Ray Rice and Kevin Smith), in fact over 120 runningbacks had more carries this season than Jones. Even in the NFL, a prototypical split-back like Julius Jones had 46 more carries this season than Jones.
With that being said, Felix Jones is no slouch. His nearly 3,000 yards as a backup is impressive, and Jones also returned kicks and punts, a demanding activity. With the return success of Maurice Jones Drew (another <6'0'' <210 lbs running back), its likely that Jones will get some views in returning kicks on the next level. Jones has also shown his stride to be great, he's able to really put the speed on when he needs it and use what height he has coming out of the pile. That being said, he needs to show he get hit and come back from it. He played in the SEC, which is a bonus, but he played in the Wild Hogs formation where he wasn't even the most focused target. He bounces off tackles rather than plowing through them, and makes a better outside guy than inside guy.
Jones impressed with a solid 4.47 40' and a great 20' drill. I think Jones will be a change of pace back, and if he can prove that he can catch in the NFL, a 3rd down back. Like Reggie Bush, and Adrian Peterson, Jones runs upright a lot. He has a whole lot of power coming from his legs and can move like lightning in the open field. But in the redzone or against tough front sevens, I think he will have problems. Jones will not be drafted to be a primary back, but he will probably be drafted 2nd-3rd round, maybe the first if a team like Dallas really wants him. Dallas would be fine to pair him up with Barber, especially given Dallas' plethora of picks and lack of need. A team like St. Louis or Kansas City could use him as well, as both teams need to lighten the load on their primary runner (who is a between the tackles guy). Unfortunately for both teams, they have more important needs, and secondary runners can be found in the later rounds.
My prediction is that Jones goes to Dallas, either in the late first, or early second. He will probably play out 4 years or so in Dallas, possibly earning the starting spot. But I do not think he will be able to lead a team in carries, at least not for a long time. Whever he goes, he will add an excellent special teams boost and a great split-back situational guy.
There we sat, a world of fans and football watches, casual observers and die hards alike. It was a moment of silence, a single moment in history when we knew not what to say. Tom Brady, hero of a hundred games and MVP, stepped back, and lobbed it deep. Here and now, the hail marry to end it all. It was simple, these were the Patriots. Moss was going to catch it, shake a safety and trot into the endzone. The cannons would sound, the confetti would fall and the champions would revel. It was all planned out, the hats were ready, the books printed the papers fresh off the press. It was all as was ordained. The Perfect Patriots, the champions of the world, the heroes of the NFL universe. We all were to bask in the perfection of their season. The perfect franchise, the greatest dynasty.
And then something happened, the ball fell to the ground, no flag, no mystery calls. Silence, for just a moment. New England was defeated, the monster lay slain. As one second ticked off, and then back on, the clock, the game ended. Three fourth quarter changes in the lead, one amazing helmet-pinned catch. Like the Tackle, and the Catch, this moment is forever. Eli Manning dropping back, the pressure, the pass the catch. It wasn't a touchdown, it wasn't the last play of the game, but it was symbolic of everything that happened this Sunday. It was improbable, impossible and no one believed it happened. I was on my feet, floored. And there you have it, 17-14, the Giants win. You'll hear the lamentations for a hundred years, and you'll remember that catch forever. But what does it mean?
18 and Done
No other Super Bowl, and no other team, seemed to be as ordained as this Patriots team was. From the brutal
Tom Brady holds the record for most touchdowns in a season by a quarterback. He is the youngest ever back to reach four Super Bowls, and until Sunday, he was the youngest ever Quarterback to win four Super Bowls. Randy Moss stood triumphant over Jerry Rice's 22 touchdowns, cruising his way to immortality as the man who made the Patriots perfect. Even the 'scrappy-do' of the Patriots, Wes Welker, whose amazing 11 catches tied a Super Bowl record, was ordained to become great. But then it all faded away. Perhaps it was karma, because the Patriots broke the rules. Maybe it was fate, because nothing perfect was built to last, who knows. Was this the Tower of football Babel? Did the gods of football strike down those impudent men, seeking to reach the unseen heights of perfection? They say the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Well, perhaps the road to failure this season was paved with perfection.
Now this season stands as a lament, a forgotten song. 19-0 is gone forever. The most potent offense in the history of football, stronger than the Browns of the 50's, more powerful than the Cowboys of the 90's or the Greatest Show on Turf in St. Louis, this New England team was unstoppable. Moss was amazing, and when you shut him down, Stallworth stepped up. When neither was there, Wes Welker appeared to be a safety valve. We fans got to see one of the greatest teams in the history of sports play. Every pass was perfect, every down used and treasured. Brady's long list of accomplishments was dotted with perhaps the most perfect performance in playoff history, when against the Jaguars brutal defense he went 26 of 28 for three touchdowns and 262 yards. Lawrence Maroney appeared out of no where to give the Pats a run game, and suddenly, in the cold and in the 4th quarter and when it mattered most, the Patriots re-emerged into their traditional, no-nonsense self. And then, to finalize their season, they came up short. Perfection was just inches away, and they missed it. Back to Tantalus, stuck between the Super Bowl and perfection, both pulled away once more. Does the season end without meaning? In some ways, yes. 18-1 is nothing, not if that -1 came when it mattered most. But this season was amazing for the Patriots. let us not deny that this game was an upset. This New England team was the strongest team I have ever seen. But even the strongest team, can fail, that is why we watch the sport.
David slays Goliath
The Band is on the Field, the Kick is Good, the game is over. Victory, over defeat. The scrappy band of nobodies upset the giants. It's so sweet it could be a movie. But what does it mean? Beyond capping a miracle 11-road win season in which the Giants, picked by certain bloggers to not even make the post season and loose their head coach in the offseason, reached the Super Bowl, this game was it. This game was the Miracle on Ice, where the West beat the East, where the Giant fell and the little team that could managed to shock the world. This is why we watch the game, to see the unbelievable, the unexpected, and the amazing. Like Iron Mike Tyson going down, and the Titans coming up short, this ending was one for a lifetime. The Giants will be remembered not just as the winners of Super Bowl XLII, but as the team that succeeded where 18 others, including themselves, had failed.
The Giants played the part of justice, blindly bringing about the end of a season of anger, frustration and hatred. The Pats ran up the score, they rubbed it in, they were cocky, superior and 'the best'. The Giants were an afterthought. Come on, the AFC Championship was the Super Bowl right? I myself considered not even turning the game on unless it came close. Boy was I wrong. The irony of all of this was, it wasn't like the Giants got lucky, or the ball bounced their way. Occasionally (like when a fumbled hand-off got flat out robbed by the Giants) luck titled for the Giants, but overall there was nothing spectacular. It was the Giants who first coughed up a turn over, and the Giants who failed twice in the redzone. It wasn't luck that let the 4-down linemen of New York abuse the Patriots O-line and for the first time since 1/2 of the Dallas game, make Tom Brady earn his plays. In the most impressive O-line, D-line battle I've ever seen, the Patriots flat out lost. The one tool that has forever been the key to the New England success, finally failed, and it failed gloriously.
The Giants defensive effort is the best I have ever seen. It was better than the 70's Steelers, who towered over lesser opponents and ground their way to 4 rings. It was better than the 85 Bears, whose defense not only stopped the Patriots, but put them in reverse. It was even better than the Ravens defense, whose supremely physical style set the standard for defenses in the modern league. The Giants, with young corners and old linebackers, managed to stop an offense that had not put up fewer that 20 points all season, and in fact had averaged 36.8 points per game. 37 points a game! And the Giants held this monster to 14. They did it by pressing the line, making (most) tackles and covering down the field. Brady got pressured, so Brady had to throw early. His receivers, so used to having the time to run routes, had to improvise, and too often it didn't work. 5 sacks and tons of hits left the Patriots breathless, and the Giants victors. So, I apologize to Tom Coughlin, who I disregarded, and Eli Manning, who I doubted. I was wrong, and never have I ever been more glad.
Really, there is only one image you need to see to remember this game forever.
It was the Great Escape, and the Catch IV.
It was Giants 17, Patriots 14.
And I loved it. This is why we watch the game.
I'll go into more detail about the league later, but let me just say I am very excited. And with the end of the NFL season, this blog will become even more active, this time covering the AAFL.
11:56 And here we go, starting in 4 minutes time, the draft begins
12:01 Van Halen's "Dreams", not a great way to start.
12:04 They are really emphasizing the relation to college football, which I think is a smart idea. I can see a lot of SEC cities getting AAFL teams.
12:11 Ouch, pull off the attacks on the XFL. They are being very sure to differentiate this league from the others.
12:16 They are going over the team Alabama protected offense, almost no reason to look too deep in the draft. They've got a lot of talent, including two nasty linebackers in Saleem Rasheed and Eddie Strong.
12:27 Peter Warrick and Chris Leak on the same team. Leak will be a huge money maker for this team and this league, depending on his success, he could be the face of the AAFL.
12:30 So, Warrick's plan is to go from the AAFL into the NFL two-a-days. That would be very, very brutal.
12:38 Marcus Randall, forever remembered for one deep pass, is a protected player for Team Arkansas. The Bluegrass Miracle gets another shot. And apparently rumors are that Team Arkansas will draft an O-lineman #1 overall, which will be a smart move. Cleveland and Houston in the NFL both made the mistake of not going after a lineman with their first picks, and paid for it with ruined quarterbacks. I think we may see some very intelligent drafts, especially with the protected quarterbacks and half backs already slotted. Though someone will go after Eric Crouch.
1:03 It looks like Michigan may be the big defensive team. And man, they need to fix these audio problems.
1:04 First pick is in...
1:05 Team Arkansas selects- a really over dramatic coach... And- Zarah Yisrael, OL, Troy University. A great pickup, a huge o-lineman with a lot of potential and strength. Pretty much sets the tone for this team as a run based team with a big O-lineman with a lot of strength.
1:08 Tennessee- BRYAN RANDALL- Virginia Tech! I loved this guy in college, great pick up great player and an amazing athlete. That is a very, very good pick. Although that makes two potentials starting QB's in Tennessee, but I think Randall can win out.
1:12 Team Texas- QB Eric Crouch. No surprise, we knew he was going to get drafted early. Big risk, potentially big reward.
1:17 Team Florida QB Eric Kresser. Kresser was the Marshall slinger when Randy Moss was running in the ball, and Kresser knows the system, played briefly in Florida and won a national championship with that West Virginia team. Kresser is the third QB taken, the third in a row no less.
1:19 Team Michigan selects QB David Koral, UCLA. Koral played all sorts of different places, and its poignant that he ended up in Michigan. With all their defensive protections, its not surprising they went QB with the first round. Interesting first round thus far.
1:22 Team Alabama selects Josh Sewell, OL Nebraska- Great pickup. Another solid O-lineman goes, he played center, should be a solid guy to bolster that line. He's not a sexy pick, but O-line depth and support is always great. Alabama, without a lot of O-linemen, he will get to start.
1:24 Team Alabama part 2- Scott Scharff- Big guy, 6'5'' D-lineman from Stanford. With all the protected Linebackers, I wonder if they could move into two middle guys and run a 3-4? It wouldn't be an awful idea, especially with this offensive-themed league.
1:32 Team Michigan's head coach sounds drunk. But Braylon Edwards is picking their pick so I have to root for him. DE Rodney Wormley from Temple. 240 lbs, shorter, a speed rush guy, probably a solid pick. A lot of coaches like that pass rush, and I think Wormley will fill that roll.
1:35 Team Florida- Pitt D-lineman Thomas Smith. Another speedy guy, given that Florida is going to run the 3-4, I can't see him being a true 3-4 DE, so I'm thinking he'll play the hybrid position.
1:36 Team Texas- Freddy McCutcheon, DT San Jose State. 6'2'' 295, small but stout a solid DT prospect. I think he could move to the outside depending on his speed. With a limited roster size (42) I forsee a lot of D-linemen able to move both positions.
1:38 Team Tennsee- Virginia Tech D-lineman Tim Sandige. Double'en up on the Hokies. Sandige was a big old guy, 311 lbs and a whole lot of hurt. Great pick up and an awesome piece of a puzzle.
1:41 Team Arkansas Nicholas Rogers, D-lineman Georgia Tech. Fills out an entirely defensive second round.
Well, that's the first two rounds, I'll give you a wrap up sometime next week on the draft and let you know my take on the teams of this new league.
In the course of NFL history, there have been 6 'dynasties'. Now, dynasty is a word filled with a lot of meaning. A dynasty is more than just a great football team, a dynasty is a team that has a year-in year-out impact on the league, and wins consistantly. Perhaps the greatest sports dynasty of all time, the Boston Celtics of the the 50's and 60's, won 11 championships. Likewise the Yankee's of the 40's and 50's, or the UCLA Bruins of the 60's and 70's, were teams that defined and shaped the league in which they existed. Each team had its famous icon, its Babe Ruth, or Bill Russell; and each was defined and shaped by some dynamic and exciting coach, like John Wooden of the Bruins, or Al Arbour of the Islanders. In their own way, these teams shaped the modern world of sports.
But too often, the great dynasties of sports overshadow their competitors, with good reason. But for ever Michael Jordan led Chicago Bulls team, there was also a Patrick Ewing lead New York Knicks, the teams that were great, but not great enough. And so, I'd like to dedicate this post, my first in a long time (sorry!) to those almost teams. In the NFL, the great dynasties are remembered like this:
1950's- Cleveland Browns (7 championship appearances, 3 wins) (Had to plug my Brownies!)
1960's- Green Bay Packers (6 championship appearances, 5 wins)
1970's- Pittsburgh Steelers (4 Championship appearances, 4 wins)
1980's- San Francisco 49ers (4 Championship appearances, 4 wins)
1990's- Dallas Cowboys (3 Championships appearances, 3 wins)
2000's- New England Patriots (4 Championship appearances, 3 wins)
These teams will always be remembered as the great ones, the definers of what it means to be football. But right next to them should be listed the following teams.
2000's- Philadelphia Eagles (4 NFC Title appearances, 1 Super Bowl loss)
1990's- Buffalo Bills (4 straight Super Bowl losses)
1980's- Denver Broncos (3 Super Bowl losses)
1970's- Minnesota Vikings (3 Super Bowl losses, 1 NFL Championship loss)
1960's- New York Giants (3 straight NFL Championship losses, plus 2 in the late 50's)
For every world champion team, these guys had one almost-world champion. Heartbreak and failure seemed to follow each franchise year in and year out. For each team, the chance to make the biggest win on the biggest stage eluded them. And, briefly, I'd like to look back on them and see how, and why, they failed. This is by no means a critique of those teams, but merely a mention to the forgotten heroes of the dynasties we well remember. From the Purple People Eaters to the K-gun Bills, these teams are the almost-theres.
The Philadelphia Eagles:
Divisional Titles: 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006
NFC Title appearances: 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004
Super Bowl appearances: 2004
Perhaps no one better emphasized the new brand of the NFL than Donovan McNabb. He was, in one package, everything that you've come to expect in the 2000's NFL. He is a quarterback, the position everyone loves to hate. With new pro-QB friendly rules dominating the leauge, McNabb helped pilot the Eagles to 4 straight NFC title game appearances, and got them to the Super Bowl in 2004. He was famous, in commercials, a great athlete, and a public figure. In our world of 24 hour news shows, McNabb became a hot topic, be it race, athleticism or the failure to get it done, McNabb was the subject.
I fondly rememer watching McNabb put together a 14.1 second scramble against the Dallas Cowboys on Monday Night, and get a huge win over a division foe. But, along with McNabb, this team will always be remembered as the one Terrell Owens sank. Forgotten are guys like Brian Westbrook, Jeremiah Trotter, and Brian Dawkins, who made up the heart and soul of this near-dynasty. The Eagles were on the verge of greatness, but could never get their foot across that line.
The Buffalo Bills
Divisional Titles: 1990, 1991, 1993, 1995
Conference Titles: 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993
Super Bowl Appearances: 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993
When one thinks of th
e greatest almost-there team, one has to think of the Bills. Buffalo is the only team in history to go to 4 consecutive Super Bowls, and unfortunately the only team to loose 4 consecutive Super Bowls. This team was loaded, and came screaming into 1990 on fire, getting to the Super Bowl without a challenge, only to come up wide right of the goal posts and loose to the Giants. But with a team full of playmakers and hall of famers like Andre Reed, Bruce Smith, Jim Kelly and Thurman Thomas, there wasn't much doubt that the Bills would challenge again. But this time it was the Redskins who drove the Bills home in defeat.In 1992, the chance came again, and after the largest comeback in NFL history against the Houston Oilers, only to be destroyed by the Cowboys. The chance at revenge came again when the Bills took to the Cowboys in 1993, but again came up short. Imagine how different things would have been if that kick had gone through the uprights instead of wide right? By their fourth trip, the curse of the Bills was real in the minds of the players and fans, 4 straight losses was too much, and the greatest dynasty that never was faded into the background.
The Denver Broncos:
Divisional Titles: 1984, 1986, 1987, 1989
AFC Championship Appearances: 1986, 1987, 1989
Super Bowl Appearances: 1986, 1987, 1989
The 1990's would be the turning point for this franchise, but the 1980's was a stretch of futility for the Denver Broncos.
The Broncos came into the playoffs as the #1 seed and reached the Super Bowl twice in three years, and added a third apperance as a #2 seed. Led by the famous John Elway, the Broncos handed the Browns two of their most infamous losses in the Drive and the Fumble, and reached the Super Bowl. After Elway drove across Cleveland's defense and put his team into the Super Bowl, everyone thought they had it locked. A brutal defense led by Rulon Jones among others helped seal the deal... almost. The Giants won 39-20. The next year, the Browns fumbled away a win to the Broncos, who got to attempt another shot at fame, and came up way too short.1989 was all about the defense. With a great D-line and tough corners, the Broncos hoped to turn the tables and get a win. Unfortunately for the Broncos, the 49ers were ready. Jerry Rice and Joe Montana cruised over the Broncos and won by a resounding margin, 55-10. Elway couldn't get anything going and turned the ball over constantly. With a young running back, and very little help in the receiving corp, Elway's attempt to win the game himself failed. But for Broncos fans, this didn't hurt too much, beacuse by the end of the next decade, the Broncos showed up to play, and defeated the Packers and Falcons to win two rings before retiring.
Minnesota Vikings:
Divisional Titles: 1970, 1971, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978
Conference Titles: 1973, 1974, 1976
Super Bowl Losses: 1973, 1974, 1976 (Also lost 1969)
Led by Fran Tarkenton, John Gilliam, Churck Foreman and the great Alan Page, the Vikings were the almost team of the 1970's. In an era dominated by the Steel Curtain, the Vikings with their Purple People Eaters, were one step behind. The Vikings dominated their division, but struggled to get out of the conference, winning only 3 (appearing in 4). Unfortunately for the Vikings, when they did get to the big game they struggled. Despite having an awesome defense, Larry Csonka had 145 yards and 2 touchdowns, carrying the Dolphins to a Super Bowl win in 1973. The very next year, the great defense of the Steelers came up against the Purple People Eaters, and came up victorious. This time it was Franco Harris who had the yards, and the Steelers dominated both sides of the line. Despite having the hall of fame O-lineman Ron Yary, the Vikings couldn't get started, and the Steelers struck first with a safety. With one last shot at victory, the Vikings came up against the Raiders in Super Bowl 11, and once more, the Vikings came up flat loosing 32-14 to the Black Hole.
New York Giants:
Conference Titles: 1961, 1962, 1963
Championship Losses: 1961, 1962, 1963
After "The Greatest Game Ever Played" in 1958, the Giants looked ready to roar into the 60's as one of the most dominant teams in the young NFL. With an offense led by the hall of famer Y.A. Tittle, and Del Shofner, the Giants came ready to play. In 1961 the Giants collapsed in front of the Green Bay Packers, loosing 31-0. The very next year Green Bay repeated and squeaked by the Giants with a second win. To round out their three years of loosing, the Giants fell to the Bears 14-10. After this loss in 1963, the Giants would go 23 years without a championship appearance, and then win two, drubbing both the Broncos and Bills enroute to their third appearance this year.
~~
So, we must ask ourselves briefly, what makes a dynasty a dynasty? Its not just success, because lots of teams get to the top only to come up short. And its not just championships, because Denver won two in the 90's, and are rarely considered the team of the decade. Why these dynasties come together seems complicated, but there are some trends. The Patriots won two Super Bowls on the leg of their kicker, the same player who cost the Bills their first shot. The Cowboys drilled the Bills in their first two meeting, leaving the Boys to win 3 Super Bowls and the Bills to loose four, the Giants were destroyed by the Packers twice as well. When Steelers quarterback Terry Bradshaw suffered, the rest of the team stepped up, John Elway did not have that luxury with his Broncos. And sometimes, despite having all the pieces in place and the team reved up and ready, like the 49'ers of the 80's, you just come up short and never get to reach that final goal.
With the year over, the cards are on the table and the only thing to look forward too for all but 12 teams is the post season, the draft and training camp next year. With the season done, its time to look back on last year and see how things came and went. Also, with the next series of posts I'll be introducing some new things I want to try over the off-season and into the next year. First, is a "stock market" of teams. In essence this will be a running tally of the team's strength, success, and moves in my opinion. The scale runs from zero, which in essence means that the Franchise has left the town and no longer exists, to 100, which is a Super Bowl win.
So, without further adeu.
The Pittsburgh Steelers (10-6)
Total- 70
The Pittsburgh Steelers have reached the post season for the 3rd time in 4 years. The Steelers won a much abused AFC North this year after pulling ahead of the Browns and watching the Browns stumble against the Cardinals and Bengals. That being said, there are some serious O-Line problems for this team in the near future as Alan Faneca wants out and the rest of the line is struggling. Big Ben played very well coming off last year's awful season, but he was sacked 47 times, which is 2nd worst in the league. And with a high draft pick, the Steelers likely won land a top tier O-lineman. Regardless, they won their division and are going to the post season. That is a good season.
Stock +10 (10 win season)
Total- 60
Easily the biggest surprise of the season, the Cleveland Browns went from 4-12 to 10-6. Although they were aided by an easy schedule (only faced 3 playoff teams), winning in the NFL is big regardless of who you play. Now, at 10-6 but just outside the playoff bubble, thanks to a mysteriously bad game by Derek Anderson, the Browns are at a crossroads. On the one hand, the switch to Brady Quinn could open up a lot of potential for the Browns, he is also unproven, so he could flop. The Browns ended up, rather ironically, with pick #22 going to Dallas, an equal trade for Quinn at #22 last year. Now the Browns need to improve their defensive line and try to compete with the 7 playoff teams (total of 8 games) they will face next year.
The Cincinnati Bengals (7-9)
Stock - 10 (sub .500 season)
Total- 40
The Bengals are two years removed from winning the AFC North, but seemed to have lost direction. Was the K von O hit the one that changed the destiny of this team forever? With Palmer in, the Bengals may have won, and this would be a very different league. Now the Bengals have lost their top O-linemen to an instate rival, they are going to risk loosing their top D-lineman this off season and are trying to radically shift both offensive (pass to run) and defensive (4-3 to 3-4) identities. That is not a situation I want to be in. Despite the fact that I like Marv Lewis, I think he has one more year before he's cut loose.
The Baltimore Ravens (5-11)
Stock - 15 (Coaching change and sub .500 season)
Total- 25
The Baltimore Ravens are a team on the edge. It would not take much for this team, which had 13 wins last season, to collapse. McNair is done, and Boller isn't going to be the long term answer. Much as I like Smith, he wont fit in this offense when the line gets old and the receivers regress. I see a lot of shifting and trading this offseason. This team is going to be rebuilding, and I think it might be a painful process. I think the Ravens are going to replace the Browns at the bottom of the AFC North pile, and with their long time coach gone, this team is on very rocky ground.
In my mind there exists three great dissapointments in Telivision History. Now, these aren't quiet tragedies (ok, one of them is) but they are serious downers. In all of the history of telivision, there are three great ones. Moments at
which Telivision took a dark turn for the worse, forever affecting how telivision is seen, viewed and remembered. They read like this: 1. The creation of Beavis and Butthead. This show was just bad. Unlike future awful shows, in part allowed because of the success of B+B, like South Park and Family Guy, this particular jem had no real redeaming qualities. The fact that this show had such an impact on American children is, to say the least, depressing. 2. Firefly was cancled. Man, this show was great. Fox really screwed the pooch on this one. How do you destroy a show of this quality? Ugh...
And 3. The NFL doesn't have a universal pay-per-view system. I understand the logic, but I think it stupid. How can
~~
By the by, I posted a list of the number of quarterbacks by college Here. It got me to thinking, which conference puts out the most quarterbacks?
I limited to guys who have seen, or will soon see, significant playing time (or were highly drafted rookies):
Pac 10- 16
Big 10- 9
Non FBS- 7
SEC- 7
WAC- 6
MAC- 6
CUSA- 5
ACC- 5
Big 12- 4
Sun Belt- 3
Big East- 2
MWC- 2
Independents- 1
The Pac-10 came out the clear winner, but check the Non FBS teams and their starters. The list includes: Kurt Warner, Steve McNair, Tony Romo, and Jon Kitna, amoung others. Just goes to show, you can find quarterbacks anywhere you want.
We can win this game, we have to win this game. Sitting at 1-2 we are in the deciding week of the first month. The Browns could be 2-1 but for a iced kicker. But the team can move to 2-2 with a win over the Ravens, which is possible (cries himself to sleep imagingin the world if the Browns were sitting at 3-1). McNair and Boller do not look like solid QB's this year, the defense has holes, and the Browns can win this game: how? Lets take a look.
The Ravens QB situation is interesting. Its not as exciting as Arizona's, but it is still an interesting trip. McNair and Boller are both battling for playing time right now, but both have major weaknesses. Boller is more able to react to the changing situations and is better able to slip free of sacks, but McNair is less likely to turn the ball over. Neither QB is a super star anymore, both can win, both can loose. I think a lot of this depends on how the defense plays. If the Browns defense starts to gel, the secondary will shut down the recievers and the pass rush will finally make the big difference it looks like it can.
Musa Smith and Wills McGahee are going to eat our team alive. Both have 4.1 yards per carry, and Cleveland has let up an average of 4.3 yards per carry for primary runners (Willie Parker at 4.0, Rudi at 5.1 and Jordan at 4.2). However, the Ravens have only 1 rushing TD , and the Browns have only let up 1 rushing touchdown by major backs (top 2 runners per game). With the questions at QB and our ability to score points, the Ravens may not have the luxury of running a lot, so the Browns may be able to keep the backs out of the endzone more than once or twice.
The receivers for Baltimore are not the team's greatest strength. The Browns corners (be they Bodden, Wright or Holly) match up well against Mason, Williams and the almost
non-existant Clayton. With good pressure will come mistakes, which will lead to interceptions. Mason will be hard to stop in the redzone, so I expect a pass to him will probably either set up a running TD or go in on his own. Boller or McNair should, should, have problems finding their receivers, and will try to pick on Wright, who will be matched up with unproven Demetrius Williams. Todd Heap will cause problems.The Ravens O-line has let up 6 sacks this far into the season, expect 3-4 more on Sunday as Peek, Wimbley and Roye start tearing it up. The Browns put a lot of pressure on Palmer, and twice downed the Oakland signal callers. McNair is slow, if he plays he will feel the pressure. Boller will be a little better, but if the corners can close down the recievers even half the time, he will have to eat the ball or take a sack. The Browns can pressure the QB, now the secondary needs to step it up.
Getting past the defense is a different story. Although Baltimore's statisticals numbers look great, the team really doesn't seem to be all that solid. Kurt Warner burned the Baltimore defense, and would have had a win but for a helmet-to-helmet flag on the final drive. If Warner, who hadn't played in the regular season since early 2006, can slash and burn through Baltimore's secondary, what will Derrek Anderson do? Last year he had 200+ yards and a pair of TD's and INT's. With Samari Rolle possibly out or playing injured, those INT's will drop, especially as Anderson's new favorite target is an uncovered Kellen Winslow (who, if he stays healthy, will be a pro-bowl lock), will be catching everything thrown to him. Winslow will get into the endzone, possibly twice.
My prediction: Either Browns 21-17 or Ravens 17-15
1. So, as you all saw in my most recent post I wrote about 3 things that would continue and 3 things that would change. Boy, got my butt kicked. I predicted that the Browns, Cowboys and Steelers would all see some sort of drop off in offensive performance. I believed none would break 30. Of course, because I am a Browns fan, only one team didn't break 30, and that was the Browns. The Steelers were held for a good portion of the game, as were the Cowboys, but both teams opened up in the 2nd half and ran away with the game. Thus far- 0/1
2. New Orleans- we will find out tonight...
3. Peterson did get into the endzone, and it was on a short field (50 yards), however the A-Train broke 100 yards (by 2!) so I'll call this one a flop. I knew the Chiefs would pressure Holcomb, and they did. I also knew they would force him to pass to Peterson, which he did. But I really thought the Vikings had the win. Technically I should give myself this one, but I think, because he broke the big trip digit, I'll call it even and stay at 0/1.
4. Brett Favre- 420, I was right, mwahahaha.- 1/2 The young Packers defense did well against the potentially explosive San Diego offensive assault. Tomlinson was held to 62 yards, and Rivers was the one to make the big plays against the underplaying secondary. Driver was a beast and took excellent advantage of the Chargers defense. The Packers, thanks to losses to the Bears, Vikings and Lions, are the clear favorites right now to win he NFC North. They could potentially go into the divisional round of the playoff, heck, given that it is the NFC they may go into the big one.
5. The Lions were ok against the Eagles, the Eagles looked great against the Lions. Anyone else feel like a moron for benching Kevin Curtis? 1/3
6. I felt a great disturbance in the NFL, as if millions of Bills suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.
Sorry John Paul, you aren't more powerful than I could possibly imagine...
Ok, of the 50, here are a bunch already affected
By the Way, I've already started chipping away at my 50-1. The St. Louis Rams, barring major injury, will win the NFC West
The Rams lost Orlando Pace, so the major injury is there. It looks like its going to be a long season in St, Louis.
7. The Lions will have an outstanding offense, their defense will hurt.
Thus far, the Lions have had an outstanding offense, and their defense just got flat out crushed.
8. The Packers may not make it to the post season, but Favre will have a solid year.
The Pack are making a good run, but will it last? Who knows, but Favre is looking really solid.
11. The Giants will collapse this year.
So far so good.
13. New Orleans will take a step back offensively, but still be #1 in the NFC South
So far so good, New Orleans is looking ugly thus far.
16. Tampa Bay will regret naming Garcia the starter before Training Camp, they will be sub .500
Garcia proved me very, very wrong.
18. San Diego will take two steps backwards this season, and have fewer than 12 wins.
Thanks Norv, helping improve my numbers.
31. Jacksonville will improve, only if Byron Leftwich remains the starter
No more Leftwich, so this doesn't really matter anymore.
32. Houston will not improve offensively, especially with the loss of Eric Moulds.
Well done Matt Schaub, the offense looked good even without their number 1 receiver. Imagine if Eric Moulds had been in that game?
47. The Patriots will loose their opener against the Jets
I've reviewed my secret film, I think I was probably wrong.
48. J.P. Losman will prove his worth this year.
He has proven his worth thus far, it hasn't been worth much.
Extra bonus points for anyone who gets the title.
Thus a lot of the offenses may be balanced on the shoulders of Willis McGahee. Now, I've never been a McGahee fan. Although I never like to see a player go down to injury, I didn't miss him when I was pulling for the Buckeyes in the National Championship from 2001. The Bills took a risk on drafting him, it paid off at first with a pretty solid year. But the numbers can be decieving. I do not think McGahee will have a good year in Baltimore, and here is why. Against solid defenses, McGahee struggles, and he typically puts up top numbers against lower tier guys. In the AFC East, thats ok. New England's defense was decent to good, as was Miami's. But New York's wasn't. Now he goes up against the brutal linebacking corp of Cleveland, and the solid defensive front 7 of Pittsburgh twice a year. And unlike in Buffalo, where he had Lee Evans and until last year Eric Moulds, in Baltimore he does not have a passing game to distract defenses.
In 2004, McGahee rushed for 1128 yards and 13 TD's. Those are pretty solid numbers. In 2004, the top 10 rush defenses were Pittsburgh, Washington, San Diego, Denver, New York (Jets) New England, Buffalo, Baltimore, Atlanta and Dallas. Given that McGahee has never rushed for under 100 yards when he starts against the Jets (which is weird), Mcgahee did not have a good year against top 10 defenses. He had 79 yards against Pittsburgh, in a game where the Steelers (at 14-1) played very few starters. He had 37 yards against the Patritos, and 58 against the Ravens. He managed to break 100 on 5 teams with rush defenses in the bottom 10 of the league, which is not impressive in itself.
Moving on to 2005 and the Losman-Holcomb year (rather than the Bledsoe-Losman year), the trend stays very much the same. McGahee rushed for 100 5 times. That year the top ten were San Diego, Pittsburgh, Denver, Carolina, Seattle, Tampa Bay, Kansas City, New England, Baltimore and Arizona (how??). McGahee rushed for over 100 against Houston, Atlanta, New York twice and the Patriots, so one against a top 10 defense. Against other top 10 teams he went like this- 39 against San Diego, 39 against Denver, 53 against Carolina, 34 against Tampa Bay, 66 against KC, and one game against the Pats where he was injured, running 8 times for 3 yards. Those numbers do not look good, even thoug he managed 1247 yards, more than his 2004 season total. Houston, Atlanta and the Jets all had bottom 10 rush defenses (Houston at 32).
Now we hit 2006, the last year for McGahee in Buffalo. The top ten rush defenses last year: Minnesota, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Jacksonville, New England, Chicago, San Diego, Miami, Atlanta and Dallas. McGahee failed to top 100 against any of them, though he did get real darn close against Miami with 91. He ran for 78 in Minnesota, 23 against the Ravens, 63 against the Jags, 59 and 70 against New England, 50 against the Bears and 26 against the Chargers. He only broke 100 twice, against the 24th ranked rush defense of the New York Jets. So he regressed, while the rest of the team progressed. The Bills were one or two wins from the playoffs, the best they have been in a few years, yet McGahee was awful.
So, when Baltimore goes to play the defenses of Cleveland, Pittsburgh, New England, San Diego, Buffalo (maybe) Miami, Seattle and maybe Indianapolis, he will struggle. If he struggles, the Ravens will falter. In the AFC North, the top and bottom are going to be really close this year, so a few losses could decide everything. On the upside, the Ravens play the Jets in week 7, so you know McGahee is good for at least one 100 yard rushing game.
As we get throught the most useless part of the offseason (OTA's don't really make a difference, in my mind) I want to take a look at what the most important things to look at as the training camps arrive in the next few months.
Let's start with the NFC East.
The Eagles
The Cowboys
Save a horse, move to Dallas. To Romo or not to Romo? That is the question. Tony Romo had a pretty solid year last year, but will forever be remembered for the Fumble. If Romo can clear his head from that one, and not get swept up in the flow like he did last year, he will be pretty solid. But a lot of that depends on just how reasonable T.O. is this year. If he plays like he did in San Francisco, they will have a good year. If he does to the Cowboys what he did to the Eagles, the Cowboys will crash and burn under a rookie head coach. The Tuna had problems keeping a lock on things, how do you think the Sardine will do? And yes, my new nickname for Wade Phillips. Would probably better fit Belichick.
The Giants
The Redskins